Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Casety

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1986PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Having reviewed the Petition for Reargument filed by Harold Edwin Casety, Jr., and the Opinion of the Court filed in this matter on December 13, 1985, it appears that revisions on pages nine (9) and twelve (12) of the Opinion are required, and that these corrections can be made without reargument. Accordingly, the Petition shall be considered as a Petition for Reconsideration and is granted. The Prothonotary is directed to file the attached corrected Opinion and to withdraw the Opinion filed by the court on December 13, 1985, 502 A.2d 177.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

Harold.…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Benson v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by30 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ZdrokSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. In re Anonymous Nos. 75 D.B. 94 & 7 D.B. 95Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. In re AnonymousSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. In re AnonymousSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API