Legal Opinion

Walls v. Shreck

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2003No. S-02-149PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Jason Scott Walls appeals from a directed verdict in favor of James Shreck, M.D. In his operative petition, Walls alleged that Shreck performed surgery on Walls’ right eye without obtaining informed consent.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

In reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion for directed verdict, an appellate court must treat the motion as an admission of the truth of all competent evidence submitted on behalf of the party against whom the motion is directed; such being the case, the party against whom the motion is directed is entitled to have every controverted fact resolved in its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hondroulis v. SchuhmacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Jay v. Moog Automotive, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Fossett v. Board of Regents of University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Swierczek v. LynchNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Boyd v. ChakrabortyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Livingston v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Keys v. GuthmannNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hamilton v. BaresNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. McClure v. ForsmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Carson v. SteinkeNebraska Supreme Court · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API