Legal Opinion

Livingston v. Metropolitan Utilities District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2005No. S-02-310PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Louis K. Livingston brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination of the rights, duties, and obligations of the parties relating to his claim for lifetime long-term disability (LTD) benefits pursuant to a policy of insurance issued by his former employer, Metropolitan Utilities District (MUD). At the conclusion of Livingston’s case in chief, the district court granted a motion for directed verdict in favor of MUD. The district court subsequently denied Livingston’s motion for new trial. Livingston appeals.

BACKGROUND

Livingston began employment with MUD on December…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Calabro v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Alma v. Furnas County FarmsNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Spaghetti Ltd. Partnership v. WolfeNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Anderson v. BellinoNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Crete Education Ass'n v. Saline County School District No. 76-0002Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Steinhausen v. HomeServices of Neb.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Gary's Implement, Inc. v. Bridgeport Tractor Parts, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Sturzenegger v. FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS'HOMENebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Smith v. Colorado Organ Recovery System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API