Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Chakraborty

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1996No. S-94-863PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C.J.

The plaintiff-appellant, Velma Boyd, brought this medical malpractice action against the defendants-appellees, Drs. Anup K. Chakraborty and Giles S. Hedderich, alleging negligence in their treatment of Boyd, including their alleged failure to inspect a catheter upon its removal from Boyd’s chest and failure to remove a fragment of this catheter from Boyd’s body after surgery. Because no expert testimony was presented by Boyd as to the standard of care in this case, the district court granted the appellees’ motion for summary judgment. Boyd appeals.

Boyd assigns two errors: (1) The district…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Kocsis v. HarrisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Zion Wheel Baptist Church v. HerzogNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Swierczek v. LynchNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Halligan v. CottonNebraska Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Steinkamp v. Caremark, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
  2. Bohl v. Buffalo CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Boyle v. WelshNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Moulton v. BOARD OF ZONING APP., LINCOLNNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ackles v. LuttrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API