Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Home Ins. Co. of New York

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1950No. 19PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WiNBORNE, <7.

On Defendants’ Appeal: The question here is whether the commissioner of insurance of North Carolina is authorized to accept ■or waive service of summons in an action against a foreign insurance ■company doing business in this State. The statute, Article 17 of Chapter 58 of the General Statutes, indicates a negative answer.

Substituted service of process was unknown to common law, but depends upon statutory authorization. And a strict compliance with the provisions of such statute must be shown in order to support a judgment based on such substituted' service. The inquiry must be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Supreme Tent of the Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Propst v. Hughes Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Byrd v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Crain and Denbo, Inc. v. Harris & Harris Const. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Morrisey v. CrabtreeDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1956
  5. Hubert D. Byrd, Administrator of John Franklin Sutton, Deceased v. William John PawlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API