Legal Opinion

Coast Finance Corp. v. Powers Furniture Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1922PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The court found as a conclusion of law that the agreement between the plaintiff and defendant provides in effect for a sale and assignment of a *343portion of the conditional sales contract. Defendant assigns snch finding as error, and contends that the transaction was in the nature of a loan and the rate of interest provided for usurious.

By Section 7988, Or. L., the rate of interest in this state is fixed at 6 per cent per annum, provided, that on contracts interest up to the rate of 10 per cent per annum may he charged by express agreement, and no more. Section 7989, Or. L., provides as follows:

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Balfour v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Nunn v. BirdOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Poppleton v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Barger v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Beach v. Guaranty Sav. Assoc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. WeinrichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. American Timber & Trading Co. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. American Timber & Trading Co. v. First National Bank Of OregonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API