Legal Opinion
Chulick-Perez v. Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 2, 2014No. 2:13-cv-2329-TLN-DADPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
The matter is before the Court on Defendant CarMax Auto Superstores California LLC’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15) Plaintiff Michelle R. Chulick-Perez’s (“Plaintiff’) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF No. 26). For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, with leave for Plaintiff to amend.
*1146I. Facts
Plaintiff was in the market for a used vehicle with all-wheel drive capability. In the months prior to Plaintiffs purchase from Defendant, in or about November 2011, Plaintiff viewed and heard…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.