Legal Opinion
Violette v. Armonk Associates, L.P.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 7, 1993No. 90 Civ. 4059 (RWS)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, James Violette (“Violette”) and Loretta Violette (“Mrs. Violette”) (collectively, the “Violettes”) have moved for rear-gument of this Court’s decision dated December 10, 1992, 808 F.Supp. 1060, pursuant to Local Rule 3(j), or, in the alternate, for certification for an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). If upon reargument the Plaintiffs motion is granted, defendant Campbell Chain Co., Inc. (“Campbell”), a division of defendant Cooper Industries, Inc. (“Cooper”), has submitted an affirmation in opposition requesting the Court to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jock v. FienNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mack v. Altmans Stage Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- DeHaen v. Rockwood Sprinkler Co. of MassachusettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Robins v. Max Mara, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In Re New York Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Ameritrust Co. National Ass'n v. DewDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Dietrich v. BauerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.