Legal Opinion

Garlington v. Blount

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1917PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Wrigbt. Floyd superior court. September 25, 1915.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Ctjriam.

1. Where one executes two security deeds conveying the same property to different parties, the grantee in the second deed can not maintain a suit in equity to reform the first deed, although the description may be incorrect and be due to the mutual mistake of the parties. This is true because the second grantee has no privity in the estate conveyed in the first deed. Equity will correct mutual mistakes between the “original parties or their privies in-law, in fact, or in estate.” Civil Code (1910), § 4573. It can not be contended that the plaintiff is privy in law or in fact. He…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pool v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  2. Putney v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. LambertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. General Development Corporation v. KirkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Steadham v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Yeazel v. Burger King Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Rawson v. BrosnanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API