Legal Opinion

Putney v. Bryan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Thomas. Colquitt superior court. July 21, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. An administrator, by virtue of his appointment as such, has no legal right to borrow money and bind the estate by a note and mortgage given therefor, although the money was borrowed for the benefit of the estate. O’Kelly v. McGinnis, 141 Ga. 379 (81 S. E. 197).(a) Nor will the fact that the money may have been used for the benefit of an insolvent estate to pay debts give the lender an equitable lien on the mortgaged property or other assets of the estate.

2. Where money is borrowed and used by an administrator of an insolvent estate, as mentioned in the preceding note, the lender, having…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilkins, Neely & Jones v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Ragan v. Standard Scale Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. O'Kelly v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Field v. ManlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Garlington v. BlountSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Bickerstaff v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Carter v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Shropshire v. KinseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API