Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Lambert

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1939No. 12588PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

It is deemed appropriate to make some elaboration of the second division of the sjdlabus, as to what persons, not parties to a previous judgment not void on its face, are authorized to attack directly its validity. Save for certain exceptions in favor of creditors or bona fide purchasers (Code, § 110-711), and others who may be excepted by statute, it is the general rule that none but the parties to a judgment can move directly for its nullification, that is, that “a third person not a party to the record can not go into a court and move to. set aside a judgment which is not *618a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tyler v. AspinwallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  2. Watts v. WattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Lawrence v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Dwyer v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Owenby v. StancilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Wasden v. Rusco Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Haygood v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Canal Insurance Co. v. CambronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API