Legal Opinion
Darel v. Pennsylvania Mfrs. Ass'n Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 29, 1989PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
CLIFFORD, J.
We granted certification, 113 N.J. 357 (1988), to review the Appellate Division’s affirmance of a judgment awarding plaintiff personal-injury-protection (P.I.P.) benefits and counsel fees in this “no-contact” accident involving an automobile and a pedestrian. The statutory provision at issue grants P.I.P. benefits to pedestrians (other than the named insured and resident members of his or her family) who “sustain[] bodily injury caused by the named insured’s automobile or struck by an object propelled by or from such automobile.” N.J.S.A.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Hill v. YaskinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Amiano v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Maros v. Transamerica Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Harlan v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lindstrom v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Cerullo v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Hovbilt, Inc. v. Township of HowellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Mountain Hill, LLC v. Middletown TownshipNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Gray v. Allstate Insurance Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.