Perez v. Pantasote, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
SCHREIBER, J.
This case presents for our review the interpretation of the newly adopted provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act, defining for the first time what constitutes “[disability permanent in quality and partial in character.” N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 (West Supp.1983-84). The pertinent issues arose in a workers’ compensation proceeding instituted by the petitioner, Miguel Perez, to obtain compensation for permanent partial disability due to an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with the respondent Pantasote, Inc.
I
The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brewer v. PorchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Cunningham v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Stanley Co. of America v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Communications Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Medical Society v. New Jersey Department of Law & Public SafetySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. ValentinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Fiore v. Consolidated FreightwaysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Matter of Adoption of a Child of Indian HeritageSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.