Legal Opinion

SHEPARD v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 24, 2015No. 113,033PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.

I 1 An insurance carrier sought review of a previous award of the Workers' Compensation Court that provided an injured worker with continuing necessary medical treatment in the form of prescriptions for pain management. The physicians for both sides to this dispute agreed that guidelines for treatment authorized by former 85 O.S.2011 § 326(G) did not provide for prescriptions as treatment for this worker's chronic pain. We conclude that the worker's statutory right under a former statute to necessary medical treatment that became a court award prior to the effective date of both 85 O.S.2011 §…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  4. Lessee of Livingston v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  5. Williams Companies v. DunkelgodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Dobson Telephone Co. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. DOBSON TELEPHONE CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. CORPORATION COMM.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. Compsource Mut. Ins. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. COMPSOURCE MUTUAL INSUR. CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. TAX COMM. and OKLA. ASSOC. OF ELECTRIC SELF INSURERS FUND v. STATE OF OKLA. TAX COMM.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API