Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
The Interstate Commerce Commission has promulgated mandatory rules gov*353erning the manner in which empty freight cars in the possession of non-owning railroads are to be returned to their owners. Before us is an action^ brought by fifteen steel producers and the American Iron and Steel Institute1 seeking to enjoin, annul and set aside the order. We must determine whether the Commission’s order is supported by “substantial evidence” and satisfies the statutory test of reasonableness. 49 U. S.C. § 1(14) (a).
The rules under review derive from a lengthy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- City of Yonkers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Richard Dahn, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1971
- Artus Trucking Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1971
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.