Legal Opinion
Richard Dahn, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 15, 1971No. Civ. A. 966-71PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACEY, District Judge:
Plaintiff sues to set aside, vacate and annul an Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission) order denying plaintiff’s application to extend its motor common carrier operating authority. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1336 and 49 U.S.C. § 17(9). A three-judge court was duly appointed and convened and seven carriers which had appeared in the proceeding below were permitted to intervene under 28 U.S.C. § 2323.
Plaintiff applied on March 18, 1969, for a certificate of convenience and necessity, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §§ 306 and 307. The certificate sought…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Illinois Central Railroad v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allied Van Lines Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
- Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trans-American Van Service, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1976
- Frozen Foods Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
- Yellow Forwarding Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1973
- Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
- Ross Express, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.