Legal Opinion

City of Yonkers v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 10, 1944No. 109PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

The Interstate Commerce Act confers upon the Interstate Commerce Commission authority to issue certificates *686of public convenience and necessity allowing any carrier subject to the Act to abandon “all or any portion” of its line of railroad. § 1 (18), (19), (20), 49 TJ. S. C. § 1 (18), (19), (20), 24 Stat. 379,41 Stat. 477-478. But the Act also provides that that authority of the Commission “shall not extend” to the abandonment “of street, suburban, or interurban electric railways, which are not operated as a part or parts of a general steam railroad system of transportation.” § 1 (22), 49 U.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Davies Warehouse Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Fogel v. ChestnuttCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API