Legal Opinion

Quilling v. United States

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided December 18, 2002No. 02-900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.

Two trials by two different juries and two different judges resulted in Quilling’s convictions.

One appeal affirmed his convictions and sentence.

Now, Quilling has filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his convictions and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

It is the procedural end of the line for Petitioner Quilling.

Petition denied.

I. BACKGROUND 1

On July 9, 1999, a jury found Petitioner guilty of one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). However, Petitioner was not sentenced on this conviction;…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boyle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  2. State v. StengerHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. StengerHawaii Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API