State v. Stenger
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
NAKAYAMA, J.,
in which MOON, C.J., joins in part.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holdings that: (1) the ICA gravely erred because the trial court should have sua sponte instructed the jury on the mistake of fact defense; and (2) the trial court’s failure to separately instruct the jury on the mistake of fact defense was not harmless.
A. The Trial Court Was Not Required To Instruct the Jury Sua Sponte On the Mistake Of Fact Defense.
The majority holds that the ICA gravely erred because the trial court should have sua sponte instructed the jury on the mistake of…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.