Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Wirt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 1, 1993No. 93-278PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

This is an appeal of the chancery court’s finding that a restrictive covenant prevents the appellants, Roy, Norma, Kenneth and Kathy Ingram, from placing two homes on their property, Lot 3, Block 5, Kellogg Addition of Pulaski County, Arkansas. We affirm.

The portion of the Kellogg Subdivision at issue is owned and divided as follows: appellees, Sedric Wirt and his wife, Phyllis, live on Lot 4 and Mr. Wirt’s son lives on Lot 5. Appellees, the Henleys, live on Lot 6, and the Wirts’ daughter’s home is located on Lot 7. Each of the lots in blocks 5 and 6 of this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance Companies v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Riddick v. StreettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Phillips v. Jacobs Ex Rel. JacobsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Merchants & Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Holaday v. FrakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Pugh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Pearson v. HenricksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Foreman School District No. 25 v. SteeleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Lester v. Mount Vernon-Enola School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API