Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Henrickson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 7, 1999No. 98-918PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

This is an appeal from an award of to the tenant in an unlawfuldetainer action. The trial court ruled that the surrender of the leased premises by the tenant-defendants, the Henricksons, to the landlord-plaintiff, Mr. Pearson, pursuant to a consent order did not preclude the Henricksons from claiming damages for loss of their leasehold interest. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the Henricksons, and awarded them $13,525.00 in damages. Mr. Pearson then filed a motion for á new trial on grounds that the award was excessive, contrary to the law, and against…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United Insurance Co. of America v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Esry v. CardenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Franklin v. Healthsource of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Continental Insurance Companies v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Avery v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Cadillac Cowboy, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Bharodia v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Womack v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API