Parker v. Mayes
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before DantzrEr, J., Saluda, April, 1910. Action by J. S. Parker, as trustee of S. M. French, bankrupt, against W. M. Mayes. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: Partial payment under compromise should be sustained: 64 S. E., 513. No citations.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Ci-iiee Justice Jones.
This is a suit upon a promissory note dated February 29, 1904, signed by the defendants, who jointly and severally promised to pay to the order of S. C. Cook twelve hundred dollars sixty days after date. Cook endorsed and delivered the note to S. M. French before maturity, but as matter of fact, the note was taken for property belonging to French and. sold by Cook as his agent, and French was real owner of the note when it was executed. French became bankrupt and plaintiff became owner and possessor of the note as trustee in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ashe v. Car. & N. W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- Earle v. OwingsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Clerks' Benevolent Union v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Clarke v. Home Fund Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
3Cited by9 opinions
- Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. JoyceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Robertson v. City National Bank of BowieTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Monteith v. HarbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Exum v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Alamance Industries v. Chesterfield Hosiery MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.