Legal Opinion

Monteith v. Harby

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 5, 1939No. 14890PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The opinion of this Court on the former appeal will be found reported in 187 S. C., 168, 197 S. E., 215. It was held on that appeal that no facts were alleged in the complaints to show that any long or complicated accounting would be required, and for that reason the Court did not erf in transferring the cases from the equity calendar to the law calendar.

After the decision in the former appeal,. a ■ motion was made by each of the appellants, upon due notice, to amend her complaint, and copies of the proposed amended complaints were attached to the notices of the motions. At the same time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. W. Gordon McCabe & Co. v. Colleton Mercantile & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  2. Parker v. MayesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. Dunbar v. FantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  4. Monteith v. HarbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. Thrower v. KistlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ingram v. Kasey's AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. King v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Watkins v. Siler Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Industrial Welding Supplies, Inc. v. Atlas Vending Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. JoyceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API