Legal Opinion
Exum v. Mayfield
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 16, 1926No. 2614PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.
On January 13, 1922, F. E. Stevens, W. G. Mayfield, Roger O’Gorman, D. L. Bowers, Edgar and A. F. Wischaemper, as makers, executed and delivered to plaintiff, appellant here, their certain promissory note in the sum of $1,000, which contains the usual provisions for attorney’s fees, and a waiver of presentation, protest, and nonpayment at maturity. The note contains several credits reducing the amount to a balance of $606.41 at the time of suit.
Four of the makers filed a joint answer, alleging that the note was not delivered by them to become a binding obligation; that there was no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parker v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Canadian Long Distance Telephone Co. v. SeiberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Clark v. GramlingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Magill v. McCamleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Robertson v. City National Bank of BowieTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Brinker v. First Nat. Bank of ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Commercial Inv. Co. of Uvalde v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Carnell v. KinserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Barr v. HuittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.