Legal Opinion

Compton v. Compton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1995No. S-5891/5941PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

William (Bill) Compton appeals the trial court’s finding that he is not entitled to reimbursement for marital expenditures that he claims benefited property of his former spouse, Gail Stover. Bill argues that the couple’s prenuptial agreement requires reimbursement. We affirm the trial court’s finding that reimbursement is not required. We also affirm the trial court’s distribution of the parties’ vehicle and disputed bank account and its finding that an award of attorney’s fees is not appropriate in this case. We remand regarding distribution of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Dunn v. DunnAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Nicholson v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hanson v. HansonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lundquist v. LundquistAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API