Legal Opinion

Lundquist v. Lundquist

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1996No. S-6761PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal is from a judgment dividing property in a divorce proceeding. George Lundquist disputes the trial court’s determinations as to the character, value, and proper distribution of the marital property. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

George Lundquist has worked as a commercial fisherman in Alaska since the 1960s. He has held a limited entry permit 1 for drift net fishing in the upper Cook Inlet. In 1985 George’s fishing boat sank near Kodiak Island. In March 1986, George purchased a new fishing vessel, the F/V…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Lopiano v. LopianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Lacher v. LacherAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. McGee v. McGeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API