Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Wise

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1931No. 6,732PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice GALtEN

This action was instituted on September 11, 1929, by Alice 0. Hastings et al. against Milton R. Wise and Edna W. Keller, to foreclose twenty-one separate real estate mortgages. A receiver was appointed pendente lite, and the cause is now before us on appeal from the order appointing the receiver.

The only question presented by the defendants’ assignments of error is whether the court erred in making the appointment.

The petition for the appointment was based upon three principal grounds, viz.: (1) that the rents and profits are pledged in the mortgages; (2) that the conditions of the mortgages…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Farmers & Traders' State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Vitt v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. O. M. Corwin Co. v. BrainardMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Berkin v. HealyMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Long v. W. P. Devereux Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Morrow v. Bank of America, N.A.Montana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Frisbee v. CoburnMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Mann v. WhitelyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hastings v. WiseMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Burgess v. LasbyMontana Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API