Legal Opinion
Burgess v. Lasby
Montana Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1933No. Nos. 7,041, 7,119PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPionorablb Charles B. Edwell, District Judge
sitting in place of MR. JUSTICE MATTHEWS, disqualified, delivered the opinion of the court.
The two above-entitled eases are companion cases arising out of substantially the same facts, and were argued to the court at the same time.
The original action, Charles N. Burgess v. W, D. Lasby and Marie Lasby, was commenced in Broadwater county on January 18, 1924, for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage given by Marie Lasby and W. D. Lasby, husband and wife, to Charles N. Burgess, to secure the payment of $20,000. There was default in the payment of taxes, because of which failure it is alleged…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Haebler v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Stephens v. ConleyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Hurt v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Plymouth Gold Mining Co. v. Amador & Sacramento Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- MacGinniss v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Progressive Direct Insurance v. StuivengaMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Radermacher v. EckertIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
- Hanson v. HansenMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Kurth v. GrindeMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Nepstad v. East Chicago Oil Assn., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.