Legal Opinion

Rountree v. Varco International, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 3, 1978No. Civ. A. No. H-76-1325PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

O’CONOR, District Judge.

Plaintiff Rountree sues under the Patent Laws of the United States, Title 35 U.S.C. and under the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act, Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a) and venue is properly laid in this district under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b). Defendant Vareo, Inc. defends against plaintiff’s claim for infringement with a counterclaim for invalidity.

Plaintiff Rountree received United States Patent No. 3,521,509 on July 21, 1970 for a pipe spinner which turns a section of well…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Smith v. Magic City Kennel Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Karl Ziegler, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marcyan v. Nissen Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
  2. Amerace Corp. v. Ferro Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API