Legal Opinion
Amerace Corp. v. Ferro Corp.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided January 7, 1982No. Civ. A. No. CA-3-79-1184-DPublished
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ROBERT M. HILL, District Judge.
This cause came on for consideration before the Court without a jury on the liability issue only, the Honorable Robert M. Hill, United States District Judge, presiding. After considering all the evidence and the arguments of counsel the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Findings of Fact
1. The plaintiff, Amerace Corporation (Amerace), is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and has its principal place of business in New York City, New York.
2. The defendant, Ferro…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Karl Ziegler, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Beckman Instruments, Inc., and Leland C. Clark, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Chemtronics, Inc. And J. Ryan Neville, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.