Legal Opinion

Hipp v. City of East Point

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 19, 1962No. 39460PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The act of 1961 (Ga. L. 1961, p. 190), amended Code §§ 19-209 and 19-210 and repealed Code §§ 19-211 and 19-212. Such act also amended other Code sections not material to the present case. Prior to such time, the failure to serve the opposite party, unless such service was waived in writing, required a judgment dismissing the writ of certiorari. While the act of 1961 was entitled in part as “An Act to clarify, simplify and conform the procedure in certiorari proceedings to that prevailing in ordinary civil cases as to appearance day. . .” and to provide for…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Hudson v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. City of Atlanta v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Barrett v. City of ChambleeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Mack Young Ham v. City of MiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API