Legal Opinion

Barrett v. City of Chamblee

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1968No. 43270PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Debn, Judge.

In certiorari from an inferior judicatory it has always been the policy of Georgia law to give notice both to the respondent who tried the case and to the opposite party, which in the case of certiorari from a police or mayor’s court is the municipality. Formerly, the former was notified by service of the writ and the latter by notice of sanction; should it happen that the mayor of the municipality presided personally at the trial he is the person to be served or notified, both as the respondent and as the opposite party. Martin v. City of Tifton, 6 Ga. App. 16 (63 SE 1132). By…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cherry v. McCutchenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  2. Hipp v. City of East PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Martin v. City of TiftonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Hudson v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API