Legal Opinion

Mack Young Ham v. City of Milton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 2021No. A20A1751Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., REESE, P.J. and BROWN, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. ALL FILINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THE TIMES SET BY OUR COURT RULES. March 4, 2021 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A20A1751. HAM v. CITY OF MILTON. REESE, Presiding Judge. After the City of Milton’s Board of Zoning Appeals (the “BZA”) denied Mack Ham’s request for a variance, he filed a petition for writ…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Cumming v. FlowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. Laskar v. Board of Regents of the University SystemCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Fisher v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Hipp v. City of East PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Hudson v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API