Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
On the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the core question is whether Delta’s Work Rules violate California’s minimum wage requirements. Given the complexities of scheduling and paying Flight Attendants, Delta has developed formulas for determining Flight Attendant pay. Thosé- formulas (“Work Rules”) are fully disclosed to Flight Attendants and form the basis for the minimum promised pay included in each Bid Packet for each Rotation that a Flight Attendant might want to work. Even where…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Armenta v. Osmose, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Cardenas v. McLane Foodservices, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Dev Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Mesa Air Group IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022