Legal Opinion

Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 29, 2015No. Case No. 15-cv-00131-WHOPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge

On the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the core question is whether Delta’s Work Rules violate California’s minimum wage requirements. Given the complexities of scheduling and paying Flight Attendants, Delta has developed formulas for determining Flight Attendant pay. Thosé- formulas (“Work Rules”) are fully disclosed to Flight Attendants and form the basis for the minimum promised pay included in each Bid Packet for each Rotation that a Flight Attendant might want to work. Even where…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Armenta v. Osmose, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Cardenas v. McLane Foodservices, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Dev Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  4. Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Mesa Air Group IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API