Legal Opinion
Buckley v. Professional Plaza Clinic Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 2, 2008No. Docket 277028PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
This case involves a wage dispute under Michigan’s payment of wages and fringe benefits act (payment of wages act). Appellant Alice Buckley, M.D., sought allegedly unpaid wages from appellee Professional Plaza Clinic Corporation (PPCC), which PPCC refused to provide. Appellant Department of Labor and Economic Growth agreed with Dr. Buckley and awarded her $15,979.14 in back pay, plus 10 percent annual interest and a $1,000 civil penalty. PPCC appealed the department’s determination and order to a hearing referee, who affirmed. The trial court reversed, ruling that Dr. Buckley was an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Kamalnath v. Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Coblentz v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Boelter v. Hearst Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Volk v. X-Rite, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009
- Anfinson v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Anfinson v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.