Legal Opinion
Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 20, 2010No. 63518-2-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
¶1 — Jury instructions are sufficient if they permit each party to argue their theory of the case, do not *42mislead the jury, and when read as a whole, properly inform the jury of the applicable law.1 2Here, pickup and delivery drivers working for FedEx Ground Package System Inc. sued for relief under the Washington Minimum Wage Act (MWA), chapter 49.46 RCW, on behalf of themselves and other drivers similarly situated. They claim a right to overtime pay and attorney fees. They also seek reimbursement for the expenses of their uniforms under the industrial welfare act (IWA), RCW 49.12.450.
¶2 The…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- The-Anh Nguyen v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Ruiz v. FernandezDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2013
- Joshua Driggs v. Andrew T.G. Howlett, M.D., et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Becerra Becerra v. Expert Janitorial, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.