Legal Opinion

Groover v. Hammond

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 25, 1917PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Writ of ‘Error to Circuit Court for Duval County; George Couper Gibbs, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtShackleford, J.

Barbara Hammond- and F. B. Hammond, her husband, and PI. L. Hammond instituted an action at law against E. A. Groover for the recovery of damages to an automobile owned by the Hammonds, alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of Groover in operating his automobile whereby he ran into and against the plaintiff’s automobile, greately damaging and totally demolishing the same. The declaration originally contained five counts, the last three of which went out on demurrer, so that only the first two were left standing, which are as follows:

“1. Barbara Hammond and F. B. Hammond, her…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pensacola Electric Co. v. BissettSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. Capital City Bank v. HilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. McCormickSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. HollidaySupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  5. Tampa & Jacksonville Railway Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Florida East Coast Railway Company v. MorganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Faulk v. ParrishSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. Carter v. J. Ray Arnold Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. Dupuis v. HeiderSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. GoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API