Legal Opinion · Dissent

James S. Holden Co. v. Connor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. Calendar 35,859PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Dissent

Plaintiff has appealed from judgment in mandamus to compel defendants, the village of Grosse Pointe and its building commissioners and clerk, to issue a building permit, refused under a zoning ordinance.

The question is whether the section of the ordinance may be sustained as a valid exercise of police power under the enabling act, 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 2634.

On the shore of Lake St. Clair, and in close proximity to Detroit, are a number of municipalities, among them defendant village, all residential in character. The defendant village contains 686 acres, and has a population of nearly 5,000.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  5. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. PickensMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Thom v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. City of Pleasant Ridge v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API