Legal Opinion
General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. City of Indianapolis
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1930No. 25,253PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
Thomas Cusack Company, for which the appellant was afterwards substituted as a party, sued to enjoin the board of park commissioners of the city of Indianapolis from interfering, by authority of an ordinance enacted under §8, ch. 144, Acts 1919, as amended by §1, ch. 32, Acts 1920 (Spec. Sess.), §10625 Bums 1926, with its maintenance and operation of advertising signs or billboards located within 500 feet of certain parks and boulevards.
The attorney for the board of park commissioners approved the form of an entry for a restraining order which was issued by the trial court in July, 1923, but…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Welch v. SwaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Robert Brown v. City of Michigan City, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Farley v. GraneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.