Legal Opinion
Travelers Indem. Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 5, 2010No. 09-1225PublishedCited by 182 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
The Travelers Indemnity Company sought a declaration in federal court that it was not obligated to cover any claims asserted against its insured, Dammann & Co., Inc., by International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (“IFF”). More than three years after Travelers initiated this lawsuit, IFF sought leave to assert various cross-claims against Dammann. The District Court denied that request on futility grounds, concluding that the proposed crossclaims either were time-barred or failed to state a claim. IFF now appeals the District Court’s denial of its…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by182 opinions
- Casey Dooley v. John WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Budhun v. Reading Hospital & Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Fallon v. Mercy Catholic Medical Center of Southeastern PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Christ the King Manor, Inc. v. Secretary United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.