Strother v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Neither the cause nor the amount of damage is in dispute. The sole issue is whether the collapse of the greenhouses is a loss which the insurance policy covers. We hold that it is. \
The relevant provision of the policy reads, in pertinent part, as follows:
Perils Insured Against
We insure for direct loss to the property described in Coverage F caused by:
2. Windstorm or hail
This peril does not include loss caused directly or indirectly by frost or cold weather or ice other than hail, snow or sleet all whether driven by the wind or not.
*736Courts must enforce the terms of an insurance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Maddox v. Colonial Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Chavis v. Southern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Huffman v. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF RALEIGHSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Akzona, Inc. v. American Credit Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hamm v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of N.C.North Carolina Business Court · 2010