Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 17, 1981No. 18PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the reduction clause of the “Master Select Risk Accident Policy” issued by defendant to insure the life of Carter Maddox applies in this case to reduce plaintiff’s recovery to one-fifth of the face amount of the policy. For the reasons stated below, we reverse the Court of Appeals’ majority opinion and find that the trial court properly held the reduction clause inapplicable and correctly granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff for the face amount of the policy.

The provisions of the policy which we are called upon…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Grant v. Emmco InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Fletcher v. Security Life & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Chesson v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State Capital Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Mazza v. Medical Mut. Ins. Co. of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Travelers Indemnity Company of America Farmington Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Freeman-White Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API