Stockton v. Yeoman
Indiana Supreme Court
From Jasper Circuit Court; E. B. Sellers, Special Judge. Proceedings instituted before the Board of Commissioners of Jasper County by Reuben C. Yeoman and others for the improvement of a certain highway, against which Almira M. Stockton and others remonstrated. Prom a judgment of the circuit court against the remonstrants, this appeal is prosecuted.
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
This was a proceeding instituted before the board of commissioners of Jasper County for the improvement of a certain public highway in that county with gravel or stone for a length of four and one-half miles, under the provisions of §§46-56 inclusive of the general highway act of 1905 (Acts 1905 p. 521, §§7694-7704 Burns 1908). Appellants and others appeared before the board of commissioners in the proceeding and filed remonstrances against the improvement. After a hearing there was a finding against them and, from the final order of the board confirming the assessments and ordering the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. WaddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. WatkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Randolph v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Hughes v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Sims v. HinesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Grand Union Co. v. SillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- City of Indianapolis v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Collins v. LayboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Bemis v. Guirl Drainage Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.