Legal Opinion

Sims v. Hines

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1890No. 14,026PublishedCited by 28 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The appellant prosecutes this appeal from a judgment enforcing an assessment made for a street improvement, and his principal contention is that the transcript, which the statute declares shall be a complaint, is insufficient.

The statutory provision is a singular one, inasmuch as it makes the transcript of the proceedings of the city authorities the complaint of the plaintiff; although, in fact, he has nothing to do with the proceedings, for they are conducted by the representatives of the municipality. The property-owner really assails the proceedings of those who are his chosen…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Palmer v. StumphIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Jackson v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ross v. StackhouseIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Weaver v. TemplinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Emery v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. WatkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Randolph v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hughes v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API