Legal Opinion

Randolph v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1909No. 21,358PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Prom Superior Court of Marion County (73,553); Vinson Carter, Judge. Petition by Corinna E. Randolph for reassessment on account of street improvements. Prom an adverse judgment, she appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

Appraisers were appointed upon appellant’s petition, under section 111 of the act of 1905, concerning municipal corporations (Acts 1905, pp. 219, 292, §8716 Burns 1908), to reassess benefits to her property on account of certain street improvements. Such appraisers made report reducing appellant’s assessment about sixty per cent. Appellees thereupon moved to strike out and reject this report, upon numerous grounds, among which was the alleged unconstitutionality of the provisions authorizing such reassessment. This motion was overruled, the report ordered spread of record, and a judgment for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Sims v. HinesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Stockton v. YeomanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Collins v. LayboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Curless v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Kingan & Co. v. OssamIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API