Reynolds v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
Michaelangelo Reynolds appeals his conviction of forgery, a Class C felony, 1 presenting three issues for our review:
I. Whether Reynolds was entitled to a mistrial because the jury received signals that Reynolds was offering perjurious testimony.
II. Whether the trial court should have dismissed the charges against Reynolds because they were the product of prosecutorial vindictiveness. 6
III. Whether Reynolds was improperly restricted in his presentation of evidence.
We affirm.
Reynolds was previously employed as a herdsman on the dairy farm of Forest Warren. Warren routinely signed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. GuzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. WardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- State v. McDowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Schiro v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Shriner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Brian S. Hartman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.