Legal Opinion

Shriner v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 2005No. 48A02-0410-CR-904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, J.

Peter Shriner was found guilty by a jury of child molesting as a Class C felony. Shriner now appeals his conviction. We affirm.

Issues

Shriner raises two issues for our review, which we restate as follows:

1. Whether the trial court properly refused to declare a mistrial or admonish the jury to ignore Shriner's testimony after Shriner referred to a lie detector test during his direct examination; and

2. Whether the trial court properly allowed the State to impeach Shriner with a prior inconsistent statement he made under oath outside the presence of the jury.

Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kalady v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Willoughby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wells v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Mayol v. Summers, Watson & KimpelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Majors v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. David Bisard v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Gutermuth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Edward Zaragoza v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. James B. Studabaker, II v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. James J. Wyatt v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API