Shriner v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, J.
Peter Shriner was found guilty by a jury of child molesting as a Class C felony. Shriner now appeals his conviction. We affirm.
Issues
Shriner raises two issues for our review, which we restate as follows:
1. Whether the trial court properly refused to declare a mistrial or admonish the jury to ignore Shriner's testimony after Shriner referred to a lie detector test during his direct examination; and
2. Whether the trial court properly allowed the State to impeach Shriner with a prior inconsistent statement he made under oath outside the presence of the jury.
Facts and Procedural…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kalady v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Willoughby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Wells v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Mayol v. Summers, Watson & KimpelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Majors v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- David Bisard v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Gutermuth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Edward Zaragoza v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- James B. Studabaker, II v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- James J. Wyatt v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.