Legal Opinion

People v. Ward

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 2, 2007No. 1-04-1852PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Joseph Gordon

Defendant, William Ward, appeals after his conviction by a jury of two counts of aggravated battery with a firearm. Defendant first argues that the State failed to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, asserting that his identification by a witness was too doubtful and unreliable and that there was insufficient evidence to prove that he possessed the weapon used in the shooting at the time the shooting occurred. Defendant also alleges that the State injected reversible error into the trial by minimizing its burden of proof and inflaming the jury’s passions and prejudices in its closing…

2Cases cited130 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. People v. ErvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. People v. RungeIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. AverettAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. People v. AyresIllinois Supreme Court · 2018

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API