Dress v. Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
¶1 — The Department of Corrections (DOC) is not authorized to either correct or ignore a final judgment and sentence that may be erroneous.1 It may petition the court of appeals for review of an alleged error of law in a judgment and sentence within 90 days of having knowledge of the terms of such a sentence.2
¶2 Here, DOC never petitioned for review of what it characterizes as an error of law in the final judgment and sentence of Christina Dress. It then refused to release her from confinement when the final judgment and sentence, with credit for time served, required. The Snohomish County…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- All Seasons Living Centers, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Pers. Restraint of GronquistWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- End The Prison Industrial Complex v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- In re Postsentence Review of: Larry Leroy BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: Franklin D. Dean, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- State of Washington v. Kelly Jay BallesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024