Legal Opinion

Dress v. Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 14, 2012No. 66262-7-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

¶1 — The Department of Corrections (DOC) is not authorized to either correct or ignore a final judgment and sentence that may be erroneous.1 It may petition the court of appeals for review of an alleged error of law in a judgment and sentence within 90 days of having knowledge of the terms of such a sentence.2

¶2 Here, DOC never petitioned for review of what it characterizes as an error of law in the final judgment and sentence of Christina Dress. It then refused to release her from confinement when the final judgment and sentence, with credit for time served, required. The Snohomish County…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. All Seasons Living Centers, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Pers. Restraint of GronquistWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. End The Prison Industrial Complex v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. In re Postsentence Review of: Larry Leroy BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: Franklin D. Dean, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  5. State of Washington v. Kelly Jay BallesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API