Legal Opinion

In re Pers. Restraint of Gronquist

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2018No. 94971-9PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.

¶ 1 This case asks how a release date is calculated for a person serving consecutive sentences for felony sex offenses. In 1995, Derek Gronquist was sentenced to three consecutive, 114-month terms of total confinement for three counts of attempted first degree kidnapping with a special finding of sexual motivation. In this personal restraint petition (PRP), Gronquist claims that his sentence expired in 2016, so his continued total confinement is unlawful. The Department of Corrections (DOC) maintains that Gronquist's sentence will not expire until 2022 and that Gronquist must remain in total…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. McDougalWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. January v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Alan D. JenksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. State Of Washington, V Timothy Patrick WalshCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API